We agree that our life is improved or damaged in two
ways: By the things we abstain from and the things we choose to do. The things
we chose are those we consider noble, things that are advantageous and things
that bring enjoyment. Things we avoid are things that are undignified, that
which causes injury and things that bring pain. Someone with good character
will tend to get it right and bad men get it wrong. The biggest stumbling block
is pleasure. Even animals choose what brings them the most pleasure. But there
can also be pleasure in noble and advantageous things.
Passions that have been formed from infancy are difficult to
adjust. And we take action more or less by the rule of pleasure and pain. It is
important to examine these because feeling delight and being pained by the
correct things will affect the outcome of our actions. Virtue is affected by what gives us pleasure and what bothers us. The decisions made accordingly
will either create or destroy the good in our lives. If actions are actualized
by the right passions causing us to do the right things, we will bring increase
and good to ourselves while enjoying it at the same time.
Doesn't it work this way with the arts? Even though a person
is talented, he will need to learn grammar to use his skill in the best way
possible. A lack of diligence in this area will cause him to fail while his
talent will be actualized by paying attention to grammar. There is a difference, however, between actualizing art and virtue. What is produced by good art is
good in itself; a song, poem or novel. But virtue isn't as evident. Performing
a good act doesn't always mean the motive is good. There are conditions that
have to be met. He must first have knowledge, secondly do it on purpose and
thirdly the action must proceed from a firm and unchangeable character. An
artist need only have the knowledge and skill to produce his product. Virtue
has conditions that are more important than mere knowledge. Motive and
consistency has to be at the core of our actions in order to have excellence of
character.
How do we recognize proper actions? We make an association
with our observations of others and the standard within us. When someone does
something admirable it is pleasant for us and we want to have the same traits. So
it takes observable actions and the right inner motives to produce acts that
show good character. A just person will emulate justice and do what it takes to
become better at it.
Most people, however, think because they have been taught
theory and know what is right that it is enough and they are good by default.
This is like a person who is advised to lose weight and exercise by his doctor
yet does nothing. He obviously will not have an improvement in his health. In
the same way, someone who follows this course in philosophy cannot be made well
in his soul.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome