Sunday, October 7, 2012
Gay Marriage
We drew the coolest house. It had an exercise room, a theater a common living room and our pads at each end. Yes it was my best friend, and we were sure it was what we were going to do when we grew up. It is normal for people no matter what gender to cohabit for a time. Sometimes brothers or sisters stay in the house they grew up in. Is there a change in rights if the two people have sex? I don’t see it. Sex induced rights don’t exist. Two friends or two sex partners; both couples have the same rights don’t they? Isn't unjust hatred toward anyone wrong? Of course had my friend and I built the house, we would have rights to our part of the investment. It doesn't take marriage to get that.
Marriage is a community thing. We invite guests and our religion supports it. The only reason law has been involved historically is to protect a dependent wife. If she stays home to raise the children and forgoes her career, she has freed her husband up to earn. Dowry rights of half the assets is compensation for her loss of earnings. The law makes things just. Obviously there isn't housewife insurance and so insurances have a family allowance. Rolls are reversed sometimes and a Mr. Mom can get on insurance also. It is this the gay community wants to get in on. If two same sex people who cohabit have sex, do they suddenly become eligible to all the benefits the law gives a housewife? Can living in dorms make students eligible for housewife benefits? I am not against gay people. The concept of special sex induced rights just doesn't make sense.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments welcome