We have been working our way through Aristotle’s study on
Ethics. The fact that people don’t change over the centuries is an interesting
one. There doesn’t seem to be much evolution in thought between then and now.
The same questions are being asked and similar answers only by different
people. I see this opinion as a critical one because it represents the
conclusions of a couple generations of people devoted to the purity of critical
thinking and it forms the basis for civil, meaning people learning to get along
in co-operative groups. Our founders used it also. They pointed out how groups
advance from anarchy, to mobs from patriarch to tribe and from tribe to civil
government. The trouble is that in all of these we are still human and have to
deal with freeloaders and despots, Laziness and greed. When there is so much
potential for cooperative art or human accomplishment, it can be wasted by bad
character. So here is the next installment with the conclusion that happiness of the soul, what can also be called contentment, joy, and peace, is what we all seek more than anything. It is the soul of a person that is fascinating as is the divine origin of happiness.
At what point do we acquire enough to complete our
happiness? Does there always have to be a carrot hung in front of us? Some say
that it is the culmination of what was our entire life and death. All we can say is
that a good person will tap into happiness as life unfolds.
It is prudish to say that other people’s success doesn't affect our happiness. We are happy when our friends and family are doing well.
It is also hard to define failure. Our disappointments vary from profound to
light and the same goes for those of our family and friends. The duration
varies also, and some go as far as saying lawless people will continue to
suffer after death. We, however, don’t know if the dead experience good and
evil as the living do. We have to assume the influence of disappointments and victories
is as weak to them as it is from us to them. But we do need to mention it since
many religions have doctrines pertaining to the dead.
The question remains whether happiness is an achievement or
an endowment. Praise is always due to comparisons. A job well done is better
than an inferior one. Praise has to do with achievement according to the particular
discipline; a great runner, a great orator. Even when referring to goodness and
virtue, we praise someone for their achievements and using discipline. What is
interesting is that we describe God as being happy and desiring to acquire
happiness. This suggests that happiness is an endowment that supersedes God
himself, although we might praise him because he is greater than all else. Praise has to do with achievement according to
certain standards that require comparisons. We cannot put happiness in this category.
It isn't virtue itself since no one praises happiness as they would justice.
Happiness is a blessed state and something that is divine and beyond virtue itself.
There is truth in saying that pleasure has a similar divine
origin. It is something that is regulated by morals, but in itself pleasure isn't good or bad. Seeking pleasure isn't always praised but it is always sought in
one way or another. What we are getting at is that happiness is the ultimate
pleasure and it is prized and perfect. All we do, all we seek, comes from this
first principle. It is the cause of all the good that we claim; something
divine and prized.
We know happiness originates in our soul and the gateway is
virtue, so by studying virtue, maybe by chance we can reveal the true nature of
happiness. We see it depends on our interactions with others and so this is a
good point to begin a study of the soul itself…